Thursday, 23 June 2016

SOCIAL STRATIFICATION IN INDIA

Ch-11 SOCIAL STRATIFICATION IN INDIA
Social stratification is a particular form of social inequality. All societies arrange their members in terms of superiority, inferiority and equality. Stratification is a process of interaction or differentiation whereby some people come to rank higher than others.
In one word, when individuals and groups are ranked, according to some commonly accepted basis of valuation in a hierarchy of status levels based upon the inequality of social positions, social stratification occurs. Social stratification means division of society into different strata or layers. It involves a hierarchy of social groups. Members of a particular layer have a common identity. They have a similar life style.
The Indian Caste system provides an example of stratification system. The society in which divisions of social classes exist is known as a stratified society. Modern stratification fundamentally differs from stratification of primitive societies. Social stratification involves two phenomena (i) differentiation of individuals or groups on the basis of possession of certain characteristics whereby some individuals or groups come to rank higher than others, (ii) the ranking of individuals according to some basis of evaluation.
Sociologists are concerned not merely with the facts of social differences but also with their social evaluation.

Definitions:

1. Ogburn and Nimkoff:
‘The process by which individuals and groups are ranked in more or less enduring hierarchy of status is known as stratification”
2. Lundberg:
“A stratified society is one marked by inequality, by differences among people that are evaluated by them as being “lower” and “higher”.
3. Gisbert:
“Social stratification is the division of society into permanent groups of categories linked with each other by the relationship of superiority and subordinations”.
4. Williams:
Social Stratification refers to “The ranking of individuals on a scale of superiority-inferiority-equality, according to some commonly accepted basis of valuation.
5. Raymond W. Murray:
Social stratification is horizontal division of society into “higher” and “lower” social units.”
6. Melvin M Tumin:
“Social stratification refers to “arrangement of any social group or society into hierarchy of positions that are unequal with regard to power, property, social evaluation and psychic gratification”.

Origin of Stratification:

Regarding the origin of stratification many views have been given.
(i) According to Davis, social stratification has come into being due to the functional necessity of the social system.
(ii) Professor Sorokin attributed social stratification mainly to inherited difference in environmental conditions.
(iii) According to Karl Mrax, social factors are responsible for the emergence of different social strata, i.e. social stratification.
(iv) Gumplowioz and other contended that the origin of social stratification is to be found in the conquest of one group by another.
(v) According to Spengler, social stratification is founded upon scarcity which is created whenever society differentiates positive in terms of functions and powers.
(vi) Racial differences accompanied by dissimilarity also leads to stratification.

Types of Social Stratification:

Social stratification is based upon a variety of principles. So we find different type of stratification.
The major types of stratification are
(i) Caste
(ii) Class
(iii) Estate
(iv) Slavery
(i) Caste is a hereditary endogamous social group in which a person’s rank and its accompanying rights and obligations are ascribed on the basis of his birth into a particular group. For example-Brahmins, Kshyatryas, Vaishyas and Sudra Caste.
(ii) Class-Stratification on the basis of class is dominant in modern society. In this, a person’s position depends to a very great extent upon achievement and his ability to use to advantage the inborn characteristics and wealth that he may possess.
(iii) Estate system of medieval Europe provides another system of stratification which gave much emphasis to birth as well as to wealth and possessions. Each estate had a state.
(iv) Slavery had economic basis. In slavery, every slave had his master to whom he was subjected. The master’s power over the slave was unlimited.

Characteristics of Social Stratification:

On the basis of the analysis of the different definitions given by eminent scholars, social stratification may have the following characteristics.
(a) Social stratification is universal:
There is no society on this world which is free from stratification. Modern stratification differs from stratification of primitive societies. It is a worldwide phenomenon. According to Sorokin “all permanently organized groups are stratified.”
(b) Stratification is social:
It is true that biological qualities do not determine one’s superiority and inferiority. Factors like age, sex, intelligence as well as strength often contribute as the basis on which statues are distinguished. But one’s education, property, power, experience, character, personality etc. are found to be more important than biological qualities. Hence, stratification is social by nature.
(c) It is ancient:
Stratification system is very old. It was present even in the small wondering bonds. In almost all the ancient civilizations, the differences between the rich and poor, humble andpowerful existed. During the period of Plato and Kautilya even emphasis was given to political, social and economic inequalities.
(d) It is in diverse forms:
The forms of stratification is not uniform in all the societies. In the modern world class, caste and estate are the general forms of stratification. In India a special type of stratification in the form of caste is found. The ancient Aryas were divided into four varnas: the Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaishyas and Sudras. The ancient Greeks were divided into freemen and slaves and the ancient Romans were divided into the particians and the plebians. So every society, past or present, big or small is characterized by diversed forms of social stratification.
(e) Social stratification is Consequential:
Social stratification has two important consequences one is “life chances” and the other one is “life style”. A class system not only affects the “life- chances” of the individuals but also their “life style”.
The members of a class have similar social chances but the social chances vary in every society. It includes chances of survival and of good physical and mental health, opportunities for education, chances of obtaining justice, marital conflict, separation and divorce etc.
Life style denotes a style of life which is distinctive of a particular social status. Life-styles include such matters like the residential areas in every community which have gradations of prestige-ranking, mode of housing, means of recreation, the kinds of dress, the kinds of books, TV shows to which one is exposed and so on. Life-style may be viewed as a sub-culture in which one stratum differs from another within the frame work of a commonly shared over-all culture.

 

 

 

Social Stratification and Social Mobility:

Social mobility refers to the movement within the social structure, from one social position to another. It means a change in social status. All societies provide some opportunity for social mobility. But the societies differ from each other to extent in which individuals can move from one class or status level to another.
It is said that the greater the amount of social mobility, the more open the class structure. The concept of social mobility has fundamental importance in ascertaining the relative “openness” of a social structure. The nature, forms, direction and magnitude of social mobility depends on the nature and types of social stratification. Sociologists study social mobility in order to find out the relative ‘openness’ of a social structure.
Any group that improves its standard will also improve its social status. But the rate of social mobility is not uniform in all the countries. It differs from society to society from time to time. In India the rate of mobility is naturally low because of agriculture being the predominant occupation and the continuity of caste system as compared to the other countries of the world.

Types of Social Mobility:

In social stratification the movement occurs in three directions.
(a) From lower to higher
(b) From higher to lower
(c) Between two positions at the same level.
Social mobility is of two types:
(i) Vertical mobility
(ii) Horizontal mobility
(i) Vertical mobility:
It refers to the movement of people from one stratum to another or from one status to another. It brings changes in class, occupation and power. It involves movement fromlower to higher or higher to lower. There are two types of vertical mobility. One is upward and other is downward mobility.
clip_image002
When an individual moves from lower status to higher status, it is called upward mobility. For example, if the son of a peon joins a bank as an officer, it is said to be upward social mobility but if he loses the job due to any other reason or inefficiency, he is downwardly mobile from his previous job. So downward mobility takes place when a person moves down from one position to another and change his status.
(ii) Horizontal Mobility:
It refers to the movement of people from one social group to another situated on the same level. It means that the ranks of these two groups are not different. It indicates change in position without the change in status. For example, if a teacher leaves one school and joins another school or a bank officer leaves one branch to work in another or change of residence are the horizontal mobility.
Horizontal mobility
clip_image004
Apart from the above two broad types of social stratification, there are two other types of social stratification in terms of dimension of time. They are:
(i) Inter-generational mobility:
When changes in status occur from one generation to another, it is called intergenerational mobility. For example, if the son changes his status either by taking upon occupation of higher or lower rank with that of his father, there inter-generational mobility takes place.
(ii) Intra-generational mobility:
When changes in status occur within one generation, it is called intra-generational mobility. For example, the rise and fall in the occupational structure of a family which leads to change in its social status within one generation is called intra-generational mobility.
Stratification and Caste:
Under the caste system status is hereditary. It is based on birth, it is purely an ascribed status. Once such positions are assigned, they can not advance and improve their social status in any way. Hence, caste as a major type of social stratification does not facilitate vertical social mobility.
Social Stratification and Class:
Class is an “open” system. Under this system vertical mobility is absolutely free. Movement from one status to another has no barrier. Status is based on achievement. It is determined by the talents, wealth, money, intelligence, power, education, income, etc. of a person. There is no inheritance of parental status.
Gender:
Like caste and class gender is another kind of social stratification system. Gender, perhaps is the oldest and permanent source of social differentiation. But within the broad hierarchy of caste and class, gender cuts across caste and class. In present day Indian society caste, class and gender are dynamic phenomena which vary between groups, communities and regions. Recent years have witnessed a thorough and widespread discussion on gender. It has claimed critical address within ender as a concept and as a set of practices has occurred during the last three decades.
The origin of the concept gender can be traced to the 19th century women’s movement and in Marxism. But it seems to have first appeared among American Feminists who wanted to reject biological determinism. Feminists prefer the term gender than sex.
But the term gender means much more than sex and more inclusive than sex. It is a socially constructed category rather than biologically determined. The gender of a man is masculine and a woman is feminine. Neither a man nor a woman is sex alone. Gender refers to the socially constructed and culturally determined role that men and women play in their day-to-day lives. Gender is the most potent significant and enormously useful analytical concept used by the feminists.
It is a matter of social ascription, a socio-cultural construction and provided a deeper analysis of inequalities existing between male and female. It refers to the social institutionalization of sexual difference. In feminist literature gender is not a value free concept rather a value loaded term and has acquired new dimensions. It is a conceptual tool for analysis and is used to highlight different structural relationships of inequality between men and women. As a socially constructed differences and relations between males and females it very from time to time and from place to place.
Gender is defined as the social construction of relations between women and men and among various groups of women and men. Feminist consider gender as the socio-cultural manifestation of being a man or a woman.
(1) According to N. Kabeer “Gender is seen as the process by which individuals who are born into biological categories of male or female become the social categories of men and women through the acquisition of locally defined attributes of masculinity and feminity.”
(2) According to A. Masefield—”Gender can be defined as a notion that offers a set of frameworks within which the social and ideological construction and representation of differences between sexes are explained.”
(3) According to ILO, “Gender refers to the social differences and relations between men and women, which are learned, which vary widely among societies and cultures and change over time.”
Thus, gender involves power structure and economic relationships. It is used to analyze the role, responsibilities, constraints, needs of men and women in all areas. It encompasses the social division and cultural distinctions between women and men. It plays an important role in shaping institutions and practices in every society.
Gender and Sex:
The term gender does not replace the term sex. It is necessary to distinguish between sex and gender. The distinction between sex and gender is fundamental, since many differences between males and females are not biological in origin. Sex refers to the physical differences of body where as gender refers to social, cultural and psychological differences between males and females.

Sex refers to biological differences between male and female which are much more the same over time and space where as gender refers to socially and culturally constructed differences and relations between males and females which vary from place to place and from time to time. Sex refers to male and female where as gender refers to masculinity and feminity. Gender is a structural feature of a society

Social Change

Ch-10   Social Change

The term social change is used to indicate the changes that take place in human interactions and interrelations. Society is a web of social relationships and hence social change means change in the system of social relationships. These are understood in terms of social processes and social interactions and social organization.
Auguste Comte the father of Sociology has posed two problems- the question of social statics and the question of social dynamics, what is and how it changes. The sociologists not only outline the structure of the society but also seek to know its causes also.

Factors of Change

PhysicalEnvironment:
Major changes in the physical environment are very compelling when they happen. The desert wastes of North Africa were once green and well populated. Climates change, soil erodes and lakes gradually turn into swamps and finally plains. A culture is greatly affected by such changes although sometimes they come about so slowly that they are largely unnoticed. Human misuse can bring very rapid changes in physical environment which in turn change the social and cultural life of a people. Deforestation brings land erosion and reduces rainfall. Much of the wasteland and desert land of the world is a testament to human ignorance and misuse. Environmental destruction has been at least a contributing factor in the fall of most great civilization. Many human groups throughout history have changed their physical environment through migration. In the primitive societies whose members are very directly dependent upon their physical environment migration to a different environment brings major changes in the culture. Civilization makes it easy to transport a culture and practice it in a new and different environment.
Population Changes:- A population change is itself a social change but also becomes a casual factor in further social and cultural changes. When a thinly settled frontier fills up with people the hospitality pattern fades away, secondary group relations multiply, institutional structures grow more elaborate and many other changes follow. A stable population may be able to resist change but a rapidly growing population must migrate, improve its productivity or starve. Great historic migrations and conquests of the Huns, Vikings and many others have arisen from the pressure of a growing population upon limited resources. Migration encourages further change for it brings a group into a new environment subjects it to new social contacts and confronts it with new problems. No major population change leaves the culture unchanged.

Isolation & Contact:-Societies located at world crossroads have always been centers of change. Since most new traits come through diffusion, those societies in closest contact with other societies are likely to change most rapidly. In ancient times of overland transport, the land bridge connecting Asia, Africa and Europe was the centre of civilizing change. Later sailing vessels shifted the centre to the fringes of the Mediterranean Sea and still later to the north- west coast of Europe. Areas of greatest intercultural contact are the centers of change. War and trade have always brought intercultural contact and today tourism is adding to the contacts between cultures says Greenwood. Conversely isolated areas are centers of stability, conservatism and resistance to change. The most primitive tribes have been those who were the most isolated like the polar Eskimos or the Aranda of Central Australia.
Social Structure:-The structure of a society affects its rate of change in subtle and not immediately apparent ways. A society which vests great authority in the very old people as classical China did for centuries is likely to be conservative and stable. According to Ottenberg a society which stresses conformity and trains the individual to be highly responsive to the group such as the Zunis is less receptive to the change than a society like the Ileo who are highly individualistic and tolerate considerable cultural variability. A highly centralized bureaucracy is very favorable to the promotion and diffusion of change although bureaucracy has sometimes been used in an attempt to suppress change usually with no more than temporary success. When a culture is very highly integrated so that each element is rightly interwoven with all the others in a mutually interdependent system change is difficult and costly. But when the culture is less highly integrated so that work, play, family, religion and other activities are less dependent upon one another change is easier and more frequent. A tightly structured society wherein every person's roles, duties, privileges and obligations are precisely and rigidly defined is less given to changes than a more loosely structured society wherein roles, lines of authority, privileges and obligations are more open to individual rearrangement.
Attitudes & Values:- To people in developed nations and societies change is normal. Children there are socialized to anticipate and appreciate change. By contrast the Trobriand Islanders off the coast of New Guinea had no concept of change and did not even have any words in their language to express or describe change. Societies differ greatly in their general attitude toward change. People who revere the past and preoccupied with traditions and rituals will change slowly and unwillingly. When a culture has been relatively static for a long time the people are likely to assume that it should remain so indefinitely. They are intensely and unconsciously ethnocentric; they assume that their customs and techniques are correct and everlasting. A possible change is unlikely even to be seriously considered. Any change in such a society is likely to be too gradual to be noticed. A rapidly changing society has a different attitude toward change and this attitude is both cause and effect of the changes already taking place. Rapidly changing societies are aware of the social change. They are somewhat skeptical and critical of some parts of their traditional culture and will consider and experiment with innovations. Such attitudes powerfully stimulate the proposal and acceptance of changes by individuals within the society. Different groups within a locality or a society may show differing receptivity to change. Every changing society has its liberals and its conservatives. Literate and educated people tend to accept changes more readily than the illiterate and uneducated. Attitudes and values affect both the amount and the direction of social change. The ancient Greeks made great contributions to art and learning but contributed little to technology. No society has been equally dynamic in all aspects and its values determine in which area-art, music, warfare, technology, philosophy or religion it will be innovative.
Cultural Factor :- influences the direction and character of technological change Culture not only influences our social relationships, it also influences the direction and character of technological change. It is not only our beliefs and social institutions must correspond to the changes in technology but our beliefs and social institutions determine the use to which the technological inventions will be put. The tools and techniques of technology are indifferent to the use we make of them. For example the atomic energy can be used for the production of deadly war weapons or for the production of economic goods that satisfy the basic needs of man. The factories can produce the armaments or necessaries of life. Steel and iron can be used for building warships or tractors. It is a culture that decides the purpose to which a technical invention must be put. Although technology has advanced geometrically in the recent past, technology alone does not cause social change. It does not by itself even cause further advances in technology. Social values play a dominant role here. It is the complex combination of technology and social values which produces conditions that encourage further technological change. For example the belief or the idea that human life must not be sacrificed for wants of medical treatment, contributed to the advancement in medical technology.Max Weber in his The Protestant Ethic and the spirit of Capitalism has made a classical attempt to establish a correlation between the changes in the religious outlook, beliefs and practices of the people on the one hand and their economic behavior on the other. He has observed capitalism could grow in the western societies to very great extent and not in the eastern countries like India and China. He has concluded that Protestantism with its practical ethics encouraged capitalism to grow in the west and hence industrial and economic advancement took place there. In the East, Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism and Islam on the other hand did not encourage capitalism. Thus cultural factors play a positive as well as negative role in bringing about technological change. Cultural factors such as habits, customs, traditions, conservatism, traditional values etc may resist the technological inventions. On the other hand factors such as breakdown in the unity of social values, the diversification of social institutions craving for the new thoughts, values etc may contribute to technological inventions. Technological changes do not take place on their own. They are engineered by men only. Technology is the creation of man. Men are always moved by ideas, thoughts, values, beliefs, morals and philosophies etc.These are the elements of culture. These sometimes decide or influence the direction in which technology undergoes change. Men are becoming more and more materialistic in their attitude. This change in the attitude and outlook is reflected in the technological field. Thus in order to lead a comfortable life and to minimize the manual labor man started inventing new techniques, machines, instruments and devices.
Technological factors:-The technological factors represent the conditions created by man which have a profound influence on his life. In the attempt to satisfy his wants, fulfill his needs and to make his life more comfortable man creates civilization. Technology is a byproduct of civilization .When the scientific knowledge is applied to the problems in life it becomes technology. Technology is a systematic knowledge which is put into practice that is to use tools and run machines to serve human purpose. Science and technology go together. In utilizing the products of technology man brings social change. The social effects of technology are far-reaching. According to Karl Marx even the formation of social relations and mental conceptions and attitudes are dependent upon technology. He has regarded technology as a sole explanation of social change.W.F Ogburn says technology changes society by changing our environment to which we in turn adapt. These changes are usually in the material environment and the adjustment that we make with these changes often modifies customs and social institutions. A single invention may have innumerable social effects. Radio for example has One of the most extreme expressions of the concern over the independence of technology is found in Jacques Ellul's 'the technological society'. Ellul claims that in modern industrial societies technologism has engulfed every aspect of social existence in much the same way Catholicism did in the middle ages. The loss of human freedom and the large-scale destruction of human beings are due to the increasing use of certain types of technology which has begun to threaten the life support systems of the earth as a whole.


Social Action

Ch-9 Social Action

Definitions of Social Action
Max Weber defines social action: action is social in so far as by virtue of the subjective meaning attached to it by acting individual it takes account of the behaviour of others and is thereby oriented in its course. It includes all human behaviour when and in so far as the acting individual attaches a subjective meaning to it.
According to Talcott Parsons a social action is a process in the actor-situation system which has motivational significance to the individual actor or in the case of collectivity, its component individuals.
According to Pareto sociology tries to study the logical and illogical aspects of actions. Every social action has two aspects one is its reality and other is its form. Reality involves the actual existence of the thing and the form is the way the phenomenon presents itself to the human mind. The first is called the objective and the other is called subjective aspects.

Parson's theory of social action is based on his concept of the society. Parsons is known in the field of sociology mostly for his theory of social action. Action is a process in the actor-situation system which has motivational significance to the individual actor or in the case of collectively, its component individuals.
On the basis of this definition it may be said that the processes of action are related to and influenced by the attainment of the gratification or the avoidance of deprivations of the correlative actor, whatever they concretely be in the light of the relative personal structures that there may be. All social actions proceed from mechanism which is their ultimate source. It does not mean that these actions are solely connected with organism. They are also connected with actor's relations with other persons' social situations and culture.
Systems of social action
Social actions are guided by the following three systems which may also be called as three aspects of the systems of social action
Personality system: This aspect of the system of social action is responsible for the needs for fulfilment of which the man makes effort and performs certain actions. But once man makes efforts he has to meet certain conditions. These situations have definite meaning and they are distinguished by various symbols and symptoms. Various elements of the situation come to have several meanings for ego as signs or symbols which become relevant to the organization of his expectation system.
Cultural system: Once the process of the social action develops the symbols and the signs acquire general meaning. They also develop as a result of systematised system and ultimately when different actors under a particular cultural system perform various social interactions, special situation develops.
Social System: A social system consists in a plurity of individual actor's interacting with each other in a situation which has at least a physical or environmental aspect actors are motivated in terms of tendency to the optimization of gratification and whose relations to the situation including each other is defined and motivated in terms of system of culturally structured and shaped symbols.
In Parson's view each of the three main type of social action systems-culture, personality and social systems has a distinctive coordinative role in the action process and therefore has some degree of causal autonomy. Thus personalities organize the total set of learned needs, demands and action choices of individual actors, no two of whom are alike.
Every social system is confronted with 4 functional problems. These problems are those of pattern maintenance, integration, goal attainment and adaptation. Pattern maintenance refers to the need to maintain and reinforce the basic values of the social system and to resolve tensions that emerge from continuous commitment to these values. Integration refers to the allocation of rights and obligations, rewards and facilities to ensure the harmony of relations between members of the social system. Goal attainment involves the necessity of mobilizing actors and resources in organized ways for the attainment of specific goals. Adaptation refers to the need for the production or acquisition of generalized facilities or resources that can be employed in the attainment of various specific goals. Social systems tend to differentiate these problems so as to increase the functional capabilities of the system. Such differentiation whether through the temporal specialization of a structurally undifferentiated unit or through the emergence of two or more structurally distinct units from one undifferentiated unit is held to constitute a major verification of the fourfold functionalist schema. It also provides the framework within which are examined the plural interchanges that occur between structurally differentiated units to provide them with the inputs they require in the performance of their functions and to enable them to dispose of the outputs they produce.
Variables
Affectivity vs affectivity neutrality: The pattern is affective when an organized action system emphasizes gratification that is when an actor tries to avoid pain and to maximize pleasure; the pattern is affectively neutral when it imposes discipline and renouncement or deferment of some gratifications in favour of other interests.
Self-orientation vs collectivity orientation: This dichotomy depends on social norms or shared expectations which define as legitimate the pursuit of the actor's private interests or obligate him to act in the interests of the group.
Particularism vs universalism: The former refers to standards determined by an actor's particular relations with particular relations with a particular object; the latter refers to value standards that are highly generalized.
Quality vs performance: The choice between modalities of the social object. This is the dilemma of according primary treatment to an object on the basis of what it is in itself an inborn quality or what it does and quality of its performance. The former involves defining people on the basis of certain attributes such as age, sex, color, nationality etc; the latter defines people on the basis of their abilities.
Diffusion vs specificity: This is the dilemma of defining the relations borne by object to actor as indefinitely wide in scope, infinitely broad in involvement morally obligating and significant in pluralistic situations or specifically limited in scope and involvement.

 

Socialisation

Ch-8   Socialisation
Process by which individuals acquire the knowledge, language, social skills, and value to conform to the norms and roles required for integration into a group or community. It is a combination of both self-imposed (because the individual wants to conform) and externally-imposed rules, and the expectations of the others. In an organizational setting, socialization refers to the process through which a new employee 'learns the ropes,' by becoming sensitive to the formal and informal power structure and the explicit and implicit rules of behavior.

Stages of Socialisation:
A view quite different from Freud’s theory of personality has been proposed by Jean Piaget. Piaget’s theory deals with cognitive development, or the process of learning how to think. According to Piaget, each stage of cognitive development involves new skills that define the limits of what can be learned. Children pass through these stages in a definite sequence, though not necessarily with the same stage or thoroughness.
The first stage, from birth to about age 2, is the “sensorimotor stage”. During this period children develop the ability to hold an image in their minds permanently. Before they reach this stage. They might assume that an object ceases to exist when they don’t see it. Any baby-sitter who has listened to small children screaming themselves to sleep after seeing their parents leave, and six months later seen them happily wave good-bye, can testify to this developmental stage.
The second stage, from about age 2 to age 7 is called the preoperational stage. During this period children learn to tell the difference between symbols and their meanings. At the beginning of this stage, children might be upset if someone stepped on a sand castle that represents their own home. By the end of the stage, children understand the difference between symbols and the object they represent.
From about age 7 to age 11, children learn to mentally perform certain tasks that they formerly did by hand. Piaget calls this the “concrete operations stage”. For example, if children in this stage are shown a row of six sticks and are asked to get the same number from the nearby stack, they can choose six sticks without having to match each stick in the row to one in the pile. Younger children, who haven’t learned the concrete operation of counting, actually line up sticks from the pile next to the ones in the row in order to choose the correct number.
The last stage, from about age 12 to age 15, is the “stage of formal operations. Adolescents in this stage can consider abstract mathematical, logical and moral problems and reason about the future. Subsequent mental development builds on and elaborates the abilities and skills gained during this stage.

Agencies of Socialisation:

Socialisation is a process by which culture is transmitted to the younger generation and men learn the rules and practices of social groups to which they belong. Through it that a society maintains its social system. Personalities do not come ready-made. The process that transforms a child into a reasonably respectable human being is a long process.
Hence, every society builds an institutional framework within which socialisation of the child takes place. Culture is transmitted through the communication they have with one another and communication thus comes to be the essence of the process of culture transmission. In a society there exists a number of agencies to socialise the child.
To facilitate socialisation different agencies play important roles. These agencies are however interrelated.

1. Family:

The family plays an outstanding role in the socialisation process. In all societies other agencies besides the family contribute to socialisation such as educational institutions, the peer group etc. But family plays the most important role in the formation of personality. By the time other agencies contribute to this process family has already left an imprint on the personality of the child. The parents use both reward and punishment to imbibe what is socially required from a child.
The family has informal control over its members. Family being a mini society acts as a transmission belt between the individual and society. It trains the younger generation in such a way that it can take the adult roles in proper manner. As family is primary and intimate group, it uses informal methods of social control to check the undesirable behaviour on the part of its members. The process of socialisation remains a process because of the interplay between individual life cycle and family life cycle.
According to Robert. K. Merton, “it is the family which is a major transmission belt for the diffusion of cultural standards to the oncoming generation”. The family serves as “the natural and convenient channel of social continuity.

2. Peer Group:

Peer Group means a group in which the members share some common characteristics such as age or sex etc. It is made up of the contemporaries of the child, his associates in school, in playground and in street. The growing child learns some very important lessons from his peer group. Since members of the peer group are at the same stage of socialisation, they freely and spontaneously interact with each other.
The members of peer groups have other sources of information about the culture and thus the acquisition of culture goes on. They view the world through the same eyes and share the same subjective attitudes. In order to be accepted by his peer group, the child must exhibit the characteristic attitudes, the likes and dislikes.
Conflict arises when standards of the peer group differ from the standards of the child’s family. He may consequently attempt to withdraw from the family environment. The peer group surpasses the parental influence as time goes on. This seems to be an inevitable occurrence in rapidly changing societies.

3. Religion:

Religion play a very important role in socialisation. Religion instills the fear of hell in the individual so that he should refrain from bad and undesirable activities. Religion not only makes people religious but socialises them into the secular order.

4. Educational Institutions:

Parents and peer groups are not the only agencies of the socialisation in modern societies. Every civilised society therefore has developed a set of formalised agencies of education (schools, colleges and universities) which have a great bearing on the socialisation process. It is in the educational institutions that the culture is formally transmitted and acquired in which the science and the art of one generation is passed on to the next.
The educational institutions not only help the growing child in learning language and other subjects but also instill the concept of time, discipline, team work, cooperation and competition. Through the means of reward and punishment the desired behaviour pattern is reinforced whereas undesirable behaviour pattern meets with disapproval, ridicule and punishment.
In this way, the educational institutions come next to the family for the purpose of socialisation of the growing child. Educational institution is a very important socialiser and the means by which individual acquires social norms and values (values of achievement, civic ideals, solidarity and group loyalty etc) beyond those which are available for learning in the family and other groups.

5. Occupation:

In the occupational world the individual finds himself with new shared interests and goals. He makes adjustments with the position he holds and also learns to make adjustment with other workers who may occupy equal or higher or lower position.

While working, the individual enters into relations of cooperation, involving specialisation of tasks and at the same time learns the nature of class divisions. Work, for him, is a source of income but at the same time it gives identity and status within society as a whole.

Social Processes

Ch-7 Social Processes

Man plays many roles within the society. He also performs many and varied social activities as per his nature, needs and roles. While performing these social activities or social actions he comes into contact with others. This contact or relation­ships with other changes the action of the individual into interaction. The behavior of each individual is affected by the behavior of oth­ers. This interaction is the basis of social life. Interaction refers to an action done in response to another action. Actions performed by a number of individuals are called interaction.
Society is rooted in inter­actions. Interaction is the basic ingredient of social relationships. The various social processes are the forms of interaction. The process of interaction, contact, forming and breaking down of relationships con­tinuously occurs in society. Behavior system grow out of interac­tion. Without interaction there would be no social life.
As members of society people have to act and behave in ac­cordance with some specific manner. They are always engaged in some sort of actions and interactions in the society. When the actions of the individual or individuals are influenced by the actions of other individual or individuals in a society and he in turn is exposed to their action that is called social interaction.
But every action is not social. When people and their attitudes are involved, the actions become social. Social interaction is the foundation of every society. It is the key factor in all social life. The very roots of society are based on social interactions. Both society and culture are the products of social interaction. Hence no society is possible without social interaction.
Social interaction refers to the entire range of social relationships. It is the reciprocal influence mutually exerted by humans through their stimulation and mutual response. Social interaction takes place between (i) Individual and individual (ii) Individual and group (iii) Group and group.
(1) According to Green, “Social interaction is the mutual influ­ences that individuals and groups have on one another in their at­tempts to solve problems and in their striving towards goals.”
(2) According to Eldredge and Merril, “Social interaction is the general process whereby two or more persons are in meaningful con­tact as a result of which their behavior is modified, however slightly.”
(3) According to Dawson and Gettys, “Social interaction is a process whereby men interpenetrate the minds of each other”.
Social interaction has four main aspects such as contact, com­munication, form and structure. Social interaction only takes place within a social structure. Various social processes are the forms of interaction. Social contact and communication are two important pre­requisites of social interaction.

(1) Social Contact:

Ordinarily coming together of two indi­viduals is contact. Kingsley Davis opines the form of contact be­comes social when the concerned people have some meaning in it and feeling of communication. In other words it constitutes human contact and interaction. According to Gillin and Gillin “Social contact is the first phase of interaction”.
Social contacts are always estab­lished through the medium of some sense organs. It is established through the medium of radio, telephone etc. and is strengthened by physical contacts like kissing, shaking of hands etc. Social contact can be positive as well as negative. Positive social contact includes co-operation, accommodation and assimilation while negative social contact includes hatred, jealousy and conflict.

(2) Communication:

Communication is another condition of interaction. Without communication there can be no contact. It is another aspect of contact. In communication an individual assesses the thoughts and feelings of another person and his behavior. The important means of communication are the language, radio, T.V. news­paper, gestures etc. through which social contact is established. The easiest way of communicating thoughts and feeling is through lan­guage. Language communication may be oral or written. But unwrit­ten and unspoken communication is also possible through signs and symbols.
Thus contact and communication are necessary for social in­teraction.
The system of social interaction is called social process. The fundamental ways in which people establish social relationship and interact are called social process. It refers to the repetitive forms of behavior which are commonly found in social life. Social interaction normally occurs in the form of accommodation, assimilation, coop­eration, competition and conflict. These forms of social interaction are also called as social processes.
These are the modes of social interaction. In society individuals continuously come in contact with one another. They cooperate and compete with each other for the realization of their respective aims and struggle for their rights. Hence social processes found continually in society.
There exists a very close relationship between social interac­tion and social process. We can’t understand one without help from the other. When social interaction through repetition leads to a result it is called a social process.
(1) According to Maclver, “Social Process is the manner in which the relations of the members of a group, once bought together, acquire a distinctive character”.
(2) According to Gillin and Gillin, “By social process we mean those ways of interacting which we can observe when individuals and groups meet and establish system of relationships of what hap­pens when changes disturb already existing modes of life.”
(3) Horton and Hunt opinion “The term social process refers to the repetitive form of behavior which is commonly found in social life.”
(4) According to Morris Ginsberg, “Social processes are the various modes of social interaction between individuals or groups in­cluding co-operation and conflict, social differentiation and integra­tion, development, arrest and decay.”

Elements of Social Process:

Social Process has the follow­ing essential elements.
(i) Sequence of events
(ii) Repetition of events
(iii) Relationship between events
(iv) Continuity of events
(v) Special Social results

Classification of Social Process or Types:

Sociologists are not unanimous regarding the classification types or forms of social processes. It has been classified differently by different sociologists. Some sociologist classified it into two types such as:
(i) Conjunctive social process
(ii) Disjunctive social process
E.A. Ross had prepared a list of 38 kinds of social process.
Blackinar and Gillin classified social processes into six categories.
Park and Burgess classified it into four fundamental types of interaction such as competition, conflict, accommodation and assimi­lation.
L. Von.Wiese and H. Buker classified social processes into 650 types.
But inspite of all these classifications social processes can broadly be categorized into two types such as associative and disso­ciative process. Famous German Sociologist George Simmel first dis­cussed about these two processes.
However we will discuss major types of social processes under two broad headings. They are:
(a) Associative process
(b) Dissociative process.
Associative processes are also called the integrative or conjunctive social processes which are essential for the integration and progress of the society. The major types of associative processes are the following. Co-operation Accommodation Assimilation Acculturation
Dissociative social processes are also called the disintegrative or disjunctive social processes. Although these processes hinder the growth and development of society, their absence results in stagnation of society. Few important types or dissociative processes are:
Competition
Conflict
Contravention
Differentiation
Let us discuss these processes briefly one by one:

Co-Operation:

Co-operation is the most fundamental associative social process. The term “Co-operation” has been derived from two Latin words: ‘Co’ means ‘together’ and ‘Operari’ meaning ‘to work’. Hence co­operation means working together or joint activity for the achievement of common goal or goals. So it is a process in which individuals or groups work unitedly for the promotion of common goals or objectives. It is a goal oriented social process. It is very important as the human society and its development have been possible with co-operaticn.

Definitions:

Co-operation is clearly defined by many scholars. Some of the definitions are given below:
(i) A.W. Green:
Co-operation is “the continuous and common endeavour of two or more persons to perform a task or to reach a goal that is commonly cherished.”
(ii) Fair Child:
“Co-operation is the process by which the individuals or groups combine their effort, in a more or less organised way, for the attainment of common objective.
(iii) Merrill and Eldrege:
“Co-operation is a form of social interaction wherein two or more persons work together to gain a common end.”
C.H. Cooley has summerised co-operation in the following terms: “Co-operations arises when men see that they have a common interest and have, at the same time, sufficient intelligence and self control to seek this interest through united actions : Prescribed unity of interest and the faculty of organization are the essential facts in intelligent combination.”
It is evident from the above definitions that co-operation is a process of social interaction in which two or more individuals or groups combine their efforts to achieve certain commons ends and objectives.
Ex:
(i) The Indians irrespective of their caste, race, creed, religion etc. differences fought against the British unitedly to achieve independence.
(ii) The Indian agriculture is mainly based on the co-operative spirit of the farmers.
Conditions of Co-Operation:
The process of co-operation involves two important elements. They are:
(a) Common end or purpose.
(b) Organised effort.
The achievement of common end calls for the organised efforts of individuals or groups such efforts should be pre­planned and properly organised. It is not possible for people to promote the process of co-operation without these two essential elements.

Characteristics of Co-Operation:

Followings are some of the important characteristics of co- operation.
(a) Continuous Process:
It is a continuous process. There is continuity in the collective efforts in Co-operation.
(b) Personal Process:
This is a process in which the individuals and the groups personally meet and work together for a common objective.
(c) Conscious Process:
In the process of co-operation the organised individuals or the groups work together consciously.
(d) Universal Process:
Co-operation is also a universal social process. Because it is found every where in all periods of time.
(e) Common Ends:
Common end can be better achieved by co-operation which is essential for the welfare of both individual and society.
(f) Organised Efforts:
Co-operation is a process of social interaction which is based on the organized efforts of individuals and groups.

Type of Co- Operation:

Different Sociologists have classified co- Operation in different some of the important types of co- operation are the following.
clip_image002
Let us discuss these types of co- operation one by one.
(a) Direct Co-operation:
In the process of Co-operation when individuals and groups co-operate directly with each other, that is called direct co-operation. There exists direct relationship among individuals and the groups. It permits the people to do like things together because the nature of work itself calls for the participation of men or groups in a together situation. It brings social satisfaction. It makes the difficult tasks easy.
Ex:
Travelling together, playing together, worshipping together are few important examples of direct co-operation.
(b) Indirect Co-operation:
In the process of co-operation when people do things individually and indirectly for the achievement of common goal that is called indirect-co-operation. Here the goal is one or common, but the individuals perform specialized function for its attainment. This co-operation is based on the principles of division of labor and specializations of functions. So in modern society indirect co-operation plays important role as the present technological age requires specialization of skills and functions.
Ex:
In a factory or industry all the workers do separate job to produce common things. In an another example, the construction of a building or house is possible as the carpenters, plumbers and masons are engaged in different activities.
Classification given by A. W. Green are the following.
(a) Primary Co-operation:
In this type of co-operation there is an identity of interests but no self interest among those who co­operate. Every member is conscious of the welfare of all. It owes its origin to personal satisfaction. It is present in primary groups like family, neighbourhood and children’s play group. Here there is an identity or ends of interest and all the members in some way or the other, derive benefit from primary co-operation.
(b) Secondary Co-operation:
This type of Co-operation is found in the secondary groups. In these groups the individuals co­operate with each other for the achievement of some self interest. This is the characteristic feature of modern civilized society which are very much witnessed in political, economic, religious, commercial, educational and other groups. It does not provide equal benefit to all its members.
(c) Tertiary Co-operation:
Primary and secondary co­operation is the characteristic of individual person while tertiary co­operation characterizes the interaction among various social groups, large or small. These groups make certain adjustment voluntarily with each other under certain compelling circumstances. The attitude of groups co-operating with each other are selfish and opportunistic in the extreme. For example, in an election when two political parties co-operate with each other to defeat the rival party, it is called tertiary co-operation.

Role and Importance of Co-operation:

Being a universal and continuous social process, co-operation plays dominant role but it is very much essential for the welfare of the society as well. So the role of co-operation may be discussed from two angles. They are:
(a) From individual point of view.
(b) From the point of view of society.

Role of Co-operation from individual point of view:

(1) Man can fulfill his basic and fundamental needs such as food, clothing and shelter by co-operation. It also fulfils many psychological needs of human beings.
(2) It is not possible for individuals to reach his respective goals without the active co-operation of other members in society.
(3) Co-operation is the foundation on which our social life is built up. The existence of society and the survival of human beings depend upon the co-operative spirit and mutual aid of men and women.
(4) With the solid and active co-operation of his fellow beings, man can lead a happy and comfortable life.

Role of Co-operation from the point of view of Society:

Co-operation is also equally important from the social point of view.
(1) It helps society to progress. Progress can be better achieved through united action. Progress in science, technology, agriculture, industry, transport and communication etc. has been possible with co-operation.
(2) It is the main spring of collective life. It builds society, it conserves society. In a democratic country, co-operation has become a necessary condition of collective life and activities.
(3) It provides solution for many international problems and disputes. Because co-operation as a process of integration has the quality to bring end to different problems through united activities.
(4) Progress is granted permanence only by co-operation. Because conflict inspires the individual to progress, but he does so only if he gets co-operation.
So it may be concluded that co-operation is very indispensable for individual as well as social life.

Accommodation:

Accommodation is another important associative social process. It is, infact a sort of co-operation among people after their conflict comes to an end. Because conflict cannot continue for an indefinite period. It must be resolved at some stage or other. The end of conflict directs the way for accommodation.
The term accommodation refers to understanding, adjustment or agreement. It is a process of getting along inspite of differences. It is a way of inventing social environments which helps people to work together whether they like it or not. It consists in the avoiding and delaying of conflict with disagreeable circumstances. Here the contending forces are adjusted to balance. It is the very foundation of a social organisation. So without accommodation, society cannot maintain its balance. Accommodation is a condition or state of mental and social understanding. For example, the workers of an industry or a factory may go on strike today for some reason but they are bound to come back to work tomorrow after some settlement with the management. In an another example, the husband and wife may quarrel for serious things at one time or another but most of the times they live together with mutual love and affection.

Definition:

Some of the important definitions of accommodation are given below.
(1) Maclver and Page define that, “Accommodation refers particularly to the process in which man attains a sense of harmony with his environment.”
(2) Ogburn and Nimkoff say that, “Accommodation is a term used by the sociologists to describe the adjustment of hostile individuals or groups.”
(3) According to Gillin and Gillin, “Accommodation is the process by which competing and conflicting individuals and groups adjust their relationship to each other in order to overcome the difficulties which arise in competition, contravention or conflict.”
(4) According to George A. Lundberg, “Accommodation has been used to designate the adjustments which people in groups move to relieve the fatigue and tensions of competition and conflict.”
(5) In the opinion of Biesanz, “In one sense, accommodation is the basis of all formal social organization”
It is evident from the above definitions that it is the basis of all formal social organizations.

Characteristics:

From the above definitions, the following characteristics of accommodation may be pointed out.
(a) Universal Process:
It is found in all societies at all time in all fields of social life. Since no society can function smoothly in a state of perpetual conflict, accommodation becomes necessary.
(b) Continuous Process:
This process is not limited to any fixed social situation. It follows sooner or later as and when conflict takes place. The continuity of accommodation does not break at all.
(c) Both conscious and unconscious Process:
Accommodation is a conscious process when the conflicting individuals or groups make efforts consciously to get accommodated to situations. But accommodation is mainly an unconscious activity.
(d) End-result of Conflict:
The hostile individuals or groups realize the importance of accommodation only after they get involved in some kind of conflict. If there is no conflict, there can be no question of accommodation.
(e) It is a Mixture of love and hatred:
According to Ogburn and Nimkoff, accommodation is the combination of love and hatred. Love leads to co-operation while hatred leads to conflict.
Forms or Methods of Accommodation:
Accommodation takes place in different ways and accordingly assumes different
forms. Some of the important forms or methods of accommodation are:
clip_image004
(a) Yielding to Coercion:
Most of hostile individuals or groups yield to physical or some kind of power exhibit the spirit of accommodation in order to end a conflict. For example-the weaker party submits to the stronger one out of fear and the stronger party can pressurise the weaker party by its superior strength. For example, an act of this kind happens after a war between two nations comes to an end.
(b) Compromise:
The conflict between the hostile individuals or groups having equal strength comes to an end through compromise in the process of accommodation. This is based on the principle of give and take. Here the involved parties have to make some sacrifices voluntarily for each other. So it is a kind of voluntary accommodation. When the conflicting parties realise that the continuation of conflict would cause sheer waste of their time, energy and money, they automatically want a kind of accommodation which is called compromise.
(c) Tolerance:
Tolerance is a method of accommodation in which two or more contesting parties tolerate each other with sympathy and try to understand the view point of others. They patiently bear the differences that exist between them. For example, the co- existence of Hindus, Muslims, Christians, Sikhs etc. in Indian society is due to the method of tolerance. This is the best form of accommodation.
(d) Arbitration:
When the hostile individuals or groups have equal strength and are determined to stick to their view point, there is intervention of third party, who acts as their arbitrator or mediator. The decisions of the arbitrator are binding on the parties concerned. For example, the conflict between the labour and management is resolved through the arbitration or arbitrator.
(e) Conciliation:
This is another method of accommodation in which the third party only gives some suggestions in order to terminate a conflict. But the acceptance of these suggestions is not the binding force. It is up to the discretion of the contending parties.
(f) Conversion:
This form of accommodation involves a sudden rejection of one’s beliefs, convictions and loyalties and the adoption of others. As a result of which the convincing party is likely to accept the view points of other party. In consequence, the party which has been convinced is quite likely to abandon its own ideas or beliefs or religion or claims in preference for the view point of the other side with which it tries to identify itself. For example- Ordinarily conversion is thought of only in connection with religion.
(g) Sublimation:
This is a method which involves the substitution of non-aggressive attitudes and activities for aggressive ones. In this method the conflicting groups give vent to their tendencies of aggression that is harmless to anyone else and also obviates conflict. For example-Mahatma Gandhi conquered violence and hatred by love and compassion.
(h) Rationalization:
In this method the contending parties try to justify their action on the basis of some imaginary ideas to avoid conflict. Hence, one blames others for one’s won fault. By ascribing one’s failures to others instead of accepting one’s defects, one can retain self respect. For example, sometimes the students believe that failure in the examinations is due to the defects in the valuation of answer scripts; they do not see the fact that their preparations for examinations are quite inadequate.
Accommodation is a significant integrative social process. It is not only useful to the individuals or groups but also to the entire society.
(i) Society functions smoothly with accommodation. It checks conflict and maintains co-operation among the individuals and groups which is essential for social life.
(ii) It helps the individuals and groups to adjust themselves to changed functions and statutes which are brought about by changed conditions. It helps them to carry on their life activities together even with conflicting interests.
(iii) The realisation of people that they should lead a happy and comfortable life has become possible only through accommodation.
(iv) It is the very foundation of a social oganisation. Because it consists in the avoiding and delaying of conflict with disagreeable circumstances. The contending forces are adjusted to balance in this process. Hence, society maintains its balance.

Assimilation:

Another integrative or associative social process is assimilation. It is also one form of social adjustment. It is a process whereby persons and groups acquire the culture of other group in which they come to live, by adopting its attitudes and values, its patterns of thinking and behaving, in short, its way of life. It is more permanent than accommodation. We reach this stage of assimilation only after accommodation.
Assimilation makes the dissimilar individuals or groups similar because it is a process by which individuals or groups come to share the same sentiments and goals. For example, in India, the religious tolerance among the different religious groups is the most appropriate one as they have assimilated many points of each other’s culture into their own and have made them integral part of their own social conduct.

Definition:

Some of the definitions given by eminent scholars are the following:
(i) In the opinion of Bogardus, “Assimilation is a process whereby attitudes of many persons are united and thus develop into a united group.”
(ii) Ogburn and Nimkoff defines assimilation, “As the process whereby individuals or groups once dissimilar become similar, that is, become identified in their interest and outlook.”
(iii) Biesanz and Biesanz hold the view that, “Assimilation is the social process whereby individuals or groups come to share the same sentiments and goals.”
(iv) Hurton and Hunt say that, “The process of mutual cultural diffusion through which persons and groups come to share a common culture is called assimilation.”
(v) In the words of Park and Burgess, “Assimilation is a process of interpenetration and fusion in which persons and groups acquire the memories, sentiments and attitudes of other persons or groups and, by sharing their experience and history, are incorporated into a common cultural life.”
From the above definitions it may be concluded that assimilation takes place when individuals come into close contact with other culture in a slow and gradual manner. It results in the promotion of cultural unity which leads to social integration.

Characteristics:

From the above definitions of assimilation the following characteristics have been pointed out. They are:
(i) Universal Process:
Assimilation as a process of integration is present in every society, all the times. Hence universal in nature.
(ii) Unconscious Process:
Usually the individuals or groups involved in the process of assimilation are unconscious of what is taking place. Unconsciously one assimilate himself with others.
(iii) Slow and Gradual Process:
The process of assimilation cannot take place suddenly. Rather it takes time. It depends upon the nature of contacts. If it is primary, assimilation is natural and rapid. If it is secondary assimilation is slow.
(iv) It is a two-way Process:
It is based on the principle of give and take. When one cultural group is in contact with another, it borrows from it certain cultural elements and incorporates them into its own culture. So it affects both.
(v) It is confined to multiple fields:
The process of assimilation is not confined to a single field but it is confined to multiple fields. In the religious field, for example, it may take place when an individual or a group of individuals of a particular religious background get converted into some other religious set or group.
Role and Importance of Assimilation:
(a) In this integrative social process, the individuals or groups acquire the culture of other group in which they come to live by adopting its pattern of thinking, behaving, its attitudes and values.
(b) As assimilation is a cultural and psychological process. It results in the promotion of cultural units.
(c) It plays a very significant role in the development of human personality.
(d) It brings similarity among dissimilar individuals or groups.
(e) It brings change in old culture, customs, traditions, folkways, mores, morals, law and religion etc.

Factors contributing towards assimilation or Factors promoting assimilation:

There are some factors which facilitate the process of assimilation are given below.
(i) Toleration:
When the people of one culture tolerate the spread of another culture irrespective of their differences toleration takes place. Here, people of different culture maintain balance by developing contacts, by participating in common social and cultural activities. So toleration is an essential condition for promoting assimilation which is in turn helpful in unity and integrity of the community.
(ii) Intimacy:
The development of close social relationship makes the process of assimilation natural and its degree becomes high. But when social relationship is not so close and artificial, the process becomes slow. So intimacy is another condition for assimilation.
(iii) Cultural Equality:
If there are striking similarities between the cultures, then there is no bar for assimilation to take place. When the degree of intimacy and toleration becomes high, it facilitates the growth of this process.
(iv) Equal Economic Standard:
Difference in economic standard hinders assimilation. But individuals or groups having equal economic standard can easily establish intimacy which intern avoids jealousy, hatred and conflict. Here assimilation progresses.
(v) Amalgamation:
When individuals or groups come into close contact to one another, amalgamation takes place. For example, the matrimonial relationship between the Hindus and Non- Hindus facilitate the process of assimilation.
Factors hindering assimilation or harmful to assimilation:
There are some factors which are harmful to the growth of assimilation or the factors which obstruct the process of assimilation. These factors are explained below.
(i) Isolation:
Individuals who live separately or feel isolated cannot establish good social relationship with others in the society. So due to lack of close or intimate relationship, the process of assimilation is hampered or even it does not take place.
(ii) Cultural Differences:
Differences in culture also hinder assimilation. The cultures having different religion, race, languages, customs, traditions do not have close relationship with each other. If assimilation takes place there, it is very difficult for its continuity.
(iii) Differences in economic standard:
Difference in economic standard encourages the feeling of inferiority and superiority. There occurs the feeling of high and low. People with the feeling of superiority decline to establish social relations with those having a sense of inferiority. So differences in economic standard stand as an obstruction in the process of assimilation.
(iv) Physical Differences:
Differences in physical characteristics like colour of the skin, growth of human body and other physiological features act as hindrances to assimilation. For example, the differences in the physical features of the black and white hinder assimilation among them.
(v) Domination and Sub-ordination:
Intimate social relation is very much essential for assimilation. But assimilation is absent or is hampered when one group dominates the other. It lacks social relationship.

Competition:

The most important fundamental dissociative social process is competition. It is a form of opposition or social struggle. It is a contest among individuals or groups to acquire something which has limited supply or insufficient in quantity and not easily available. It is characterized by non-co-operation. Here the competitors forces their attention on the goal or the reward they are struggling to achieve but not on themselves. They try to achieve the goal by methods other than force or fraud.
Generally in our society there is competition for getting jobs. The people who are already employed desire for better jobs. There is no competition for sunshine, water, fresh air etc. which are treated as the free gift of nature.
When there is a shift in interest from the objects of competition to the competitors themselves, it is called rivalry or personal competition. But when the individuals or groups compete with each other, not on personal level but as members of group, competition is impersonal.

Definition of Competition:

There are many definitions of competition given by different scholars. Some of the important definitions are given below:
Park and Burgess define Competition as “an interaction without social contact.”
E.S. Bogardus define Competition as “a contest to obtain something which does not exist in a quantity sufficient to meet the demand.”
Majumdar says that “Competition is the impersonalized struggle among resembling creatures for goods and services which are scarce or limited in quantity.”
Horton and Hunt opine that, “competition is the struggle for possession of rewards which are limited in supply, goods, status, and power, love anything.”
H.P. Fairchild states that, “Competition is the struggle for the use or possession of limited goods.”
From the above definitions it may be concluded that competition is a process in which individuals or groups try to obtain thing or things which have limited supply and which they cannot achieve or share collectively.”

Features of Competition:

Competition as a disintegrative social process has the following characteristic features:
(1) Universal Process:
It is the most universal social process present in all societies, whether civilized or uncivilized, rural or urban, traditional or modern in all periods of history and among all classes of people like doctors, engineers, workers, students and farmers etc.
(2) Continuous Process:
Competition is a continuous process as it never comes to an end. If one process of competition ends then another process of competition stands there. The desire for status, power and wealth in an ever increasing degree makes competition a continuous process.
(3) Unconscious Process:
The individuals or the groups who are involved in the process of competition do not bother about themselves but they are primarily concerned with the achievement of goal or reward. Hence competition takes place on an unconscious level.
(4) Impersonal Process:
Those who take part in competition do not know one another at all. They do not compete with each other on personal level. They focus their attention on the goal or reward which they are trying to achieve. They do not have any contact whatsoever. According to Ogburn an Nimkoff, “Struggle is personal competition.”
(5) Always governed by norms:
Nowhere competition is unregulated. It is always and everywhere governed by norms. Competitors are expected to use fair means to achieve success.

Forms of Competition:

Competition as a universal social process is found in all fields of social life. In our day to day life we come across many types or forms of competitions. Some of the important competitions are the following.
(i) Political Competition.
(ii) Social Competition.
(iii) Economic Competition.
(iv) Cultural Competition.
(v) Racial Competition.
(i) Political Competition:
This type of competition is found in the political field. For example, during election each and every political party competes for getting majority. This is not only found at national level but at international level. Also there is keen competition between nations who are wedded to different political ideologies.
(ii) Social Competition:
To get high social status usually this social competition is mostly observed in open societies where individual’s talent, capacity, ability as well as merit are given weightage.
(iii) Economic Competition:
In economic field economic competition is fairly observed. It is the most vigorous form of competition. It is reflected in the process of production, distribution and consumption of goods. In the economic field men compete for salaries, jobs and promotions etc. They generally compete for higher standard of living. This economic competition is not only present at individual level but also at group level.
(iv) Cultural Competition:
Cultural competition is present among different cultures. When two or more cultures try to show their superiority over others, this type of competition takes place. Here arises cultural diversities. For example, in the modern society there is cultural competition between the Hindus and the Muslims. In the ancient period, there was a strong competition between the cultures of Aryans and Non-Aryans.
(v) Racial Competition:
Like cultural competition, racial competition is found among the major races of world. When one race tries to establish its supremacy over other races, it gives birth to racial competition. For example the competition between Negroes and the whites is the bright example of racial competition.

Role and Importance of Competition:

Competition plays a significant role not only in the life of persons but also for the groups and societies. Some sociologists say that it is even more basic than the process of co-operation. Hobbes had remarked that the struggle is the basic law of life. Rousseau and Hegel also corroborated their views. Later on, in Darwin’s theory of evolution, the principle of “Survival of the fittest” also stressed the importance of competition in society. The importance of competition may be discussed under two broad headings.
They are:
(a) Positive Role
(b) Negative Role.
(a) Positive Role:
It includes the positive functions of competitions. They are:
(i) The role and status of the individual members in the society is determined by competition. Thus it assigns individuals their places in the social system.
(ii) It protects the individuals from direct conflicts and provides a solution to the problem of limited supply and unlimited demand of goods in a peaceful way.
(iii) It furnishes motivation in the desire to excel or obtain recognition or to win an award.
(iv) Fair competition is conducive to economic as well as social progress and even to general welfare as it spurs individuals and groups or to put in their best efforts.
(v) It provides social mobility to the individual members of the society. It helps them to improve their social status.
(vi) The division of labor and the entire complex economic organization in modern life are the products of competition.
(b) Negative Role:
Apart from the positive functions, competition also performs some negative functions.
(i) Unfair use of competition causes a great deal of wastage in the economic field.
(ii) Sometimes competition leads to exploitation when it is unrestricted.
(iii) Unhealthy competition creates psychological and emotional disturbances which is harmful to the society.
(iv) If competition becomes uncontrolled it takes violent form, i.e. conflict.
So from the above discussion we come to know that healthy and fair competition should be encouraged instead of unfair and unrestricted competition.

Conflict:

Another significant dissociative social process is conflict. It is an ever present process in human society. Whenever a person or persons or groups seek to gain reward not by surpassing other competitors but by preventing them from effective competition, conflict takes place. In other words, it is a competition in its more hostile and personal forms. It is a process of seeking to obtain rewards by eliminating or weakening the competitors. It is seen that conflict makes an individual or group try to frustrate the effort of another individual or group who are seeking the same object. It implies a struggle or fight among individuals or groups for a particular purpose or a number of purposes.
For example, the movements like Civil Disobedience, Non- Co-operation and Satyagraha launched by Mahatma Gandhi against the Britishers in India before Independence are conflict. Even in today’s society conflict is found in every sphere like caste, religion, language, culture and so on. Thus it is considered as a universal social process.

Definitions:

Some of the important definitions given by the sociologists are stated below:
Kingsley Davis defines Conflict, “as a modified form of struggle.”
Maclver and Page state that, “Social conflict included all activity in which men contend against one another for any objective.”
A.W. Green says, “Conflict is the deliberate attempt to oppose, resist or coerce the will of another or others.”
Majumdar defines that, “Conflict is an opposition or struggle involving an emotional attitude of hostility as well as violent interference with autonomous choice.”
Gillin and Gillin state that, “Conflict is the social process in which individuals or groups seek their ends by directly challenging the antagonist by violence or threat of violence.”
From the above definitions, it is clear that individuals or groups involved in conflict try to oppose, resist or coerce each other deliberately. It is the opposite of co-operation. It is a process which leads two or more persons or groups to try to frustrate the attempts of their opponents to attain certain objectives. Examples:
(i) The conflict between nations leads to national conflict.
(ii) The conflict between different political parties leads to political conflict.
(iii) Caste conflict, class conflict and racial conflict etc.

Features of Conflict:

From the above definitions the following characteristics may be noted.
(i) Universal Process:
Conflict is found in all societies in all periods of time. The degree and the form of conflict may vary from society to society and from time to time but it is present in all types of societies.
(ii) Conscious Process:
This is a process in which the conflicting parties are very much conscious in causing loss or injury to persons or groups. They attempt to fight or oppose and defeat each other consciously.
(iii) Personal Process:
The chief aim of conflict is to cause harm or to bring loss to the opponents. The conflicting parties personally know each other. So in this form of struggle to overcome the opponents, the goal is temporarily relegated to a level of secondary importance.
(iv) Intermittent Process:
Conflict is not as continuous as competition. It is an intermittent process. It takes place suddenly and comes to an end quickly. It never continues for ever due to the occasional occurrence of conflict.
(v) Conflict is based on violence:
Sometimes conflict takes the form of violence. Violence is harmful to the growth of the society and retards the progress as it creates a number of problems.
If conflict occurs non-violently, it maintains peace in the society which is helpful for its development.
Causes of Conflict (Why does conflict take Place?)
Conflict is a deliberate process. It does not occur spontaneously. Although it is a universal social process, its causes vary from individual to individual, group to group and from time to time. It is caused not by single factor but by multiple factors.
The famous population list Malthus says that it is caused by the means of subsistence increase in arithmetical progression and increase of population in geometrical progression. It implies that conflict arises only when the population of a country increases and the means of livelihood decreases. It results in the scarcity of the means of subsistence which leads to conflict.
Let us discuss some of the important causes of conflict.
clip_image006

Types of Conflict:

Conflict is found in many forms in all the societies. Some of the important classification of conflict given by different scholars are the following.
(i) Classification of Maclver and Page:
According to Maclver and Page there are mainly two types of conflict.
(a) Direct Conflict.
(b) Indirect Conflict.
(a) Direct Conflict:
In this type of conflict the conflicting individuals or groups try to harm each other directly to attain the goal or reward at the expense of their opponents even by going to the extent of injuring or destroying their rivals. Direct conflict may be of two types.
(i) Less Violent.
(ii) More Violent.
Sometimes direct conflict takes less violent form. So it is less harmful. For example litigation, propagandistic activities etc.
More violent form of direct conflict is more harmful, for example war, riots, revolutions etc.
(b) Indirect Conflict:
When the conflicting parties try to frustrate the efforts of their opponents indirectly it is called indirect conflict. The keen competition among the parties automatically takes the form of indirect conflict. For example, when two manufacturers go on lowering the prices of their commodities till both of them are declared insolvent is indirect conflict.
(ii) Classification of Gillin and Gillin:
Gillin and Gillin have given five types of conflict. They are:
(a) Personal.
(b) Racial
(c) Political
(d) Class
(e) International.
(a) Personal conflict takes place on personal level due to selfish nature of man. It takes place among the members of the same group when there is clash in their aims and ideas. For example, the conflict between two qualified persons for a common post.
(b) Racial conflict takes place among different races of the World. Some of the races feel superior to other races and some others feel inferior. So the feelings of superiority and inferiority causes racial conflict. For example, the conflict between Whites and Negroes.
(c) Political conflict is found in the political field. When the different political leaders or the political parties try to gain power in democratic countries it is called political conflict.
(d) Class conflict is present among the different classes of the society. Our modern society has been characterized by classes which are based on power, income, education etc. Although class is an open system conflict takes place among different classes due to the difference in power, income, prestige etc. For example, the conflict between the proletariat and bourgeoisie according to Karl Marx led to class struggle.
(e) International conflict takes place between different nations. When the nations try to achieve common objective by suppressing each other international conflict takes place. For example, the conflict between India and Pakistan regarding Kashmir Issue.
(iii) Classification of George Simmel:
According to George Simmel there are four major forms of conflict. They are:
(a) War
(b) Feud
(c) Litigation
(d) Conflict of Impersonal Ideals.
(a) War is a type of direct conflict. When all the efforts of the different nations fail to resolve the conflict, war takes place. This is the only solution to bring peace.
(b) Feud is another type of conflict which takes place among the members of the society. So it is also called intra-group conflict. It differs from society to society in degrees. It is also sometimes referred as factional strife.
(c) Litigation is judicial by nature. In order to redress the grievances and to get justice people take the help of judiciary which is called litigation. For example, for a piece of land when two farmers take the help of judiciary. Litigation takes place.
(d) Conflict of Impersonal Ideals-when the individuals do not aim at achieving personal gain but for some ideals it is called the conflict of impersonal ideals. Here every party tries to justify the truthfulness of its own ideals. For example, when a political party tries to show that its ideals are better than that of other political parties. This conflict takes place.

Importance of Conflict:

Although conflict is a form of struggle or fight, it is essential both for the individuals and society. It performs both constructive as well as destructive functions. Conflict is constructive in the sense when it is helpful in the smooth running of the society. It is destructive when it hinders the peaceful atmosphere and retards the progress of the society.
The chief functions of conflict may be discussed under two broad headings. They are:
(i) Positive functions
(ii) Negative functions.
Positive Function:
The positive functions are purely constructive in nature.
(a) Conflict increases fellow feeling, brotherhood and social solidarity within groups and societies. For example, inter-group conflict promotes intra-group co-operation.
(b) Conflict helps in the exchange of cultural elements when comes to an end.
(c) It changes the status of the group or society which comes to be regarded as super power.
(d) When conflict is over, the parties give up old values and accept new ones. It brings changes in old customs, traditions, folkways and mores.
(e) Sometimes conflict helps in increasing the production which adds to the national income.
Negative Function:
The negative functions are called the destructive functions. Some of the negative functions of conflict are given below.
1. In the process of conflict, the defeated party becomes psychologically and normally down.
2. Time, money and energy of the conflicting parties get exhausted.
3. Uncontrolled conflict brings violence which leads to destruction of lives and properties of the countless individuals.
4. Social solidarity is adversely affected by conflict. It hinders national integration.
5. Sometimes conflict leads to inter-group tension and disrupts group unity.
6. Conflict diverts members’ attention from group objectives.
From the above discussion we come to know that conflict has both positive and negative importance. Its positive functions are more important than the negative ones. Moreover, conflict plays a very important role in consolidating a group internally.
clip_image008